Finding a JAV actress by her English name
You remember a name. You type it in. Nothing.
This is the most common way a search fails here, and it is almost never because the performer is missing.
This page contains affiliate links. Prices and plan details are what the official site showed in November 2026.
Why the name does not match
Japanese names have no single correct romanisation. The same performer can appear as Yui Hatano or Hatano Yui, and the vowels move as well: Asou, Asō and Aso are all the same person, and we credit Hohjo where another site writes Hojo or Houjo.
The f/h pair does the same thing. We credit Hutaba; elsewhere it is Futaba. Neither spelling is wrong, which is exactly the problem.
Then there is order. Japanese puts the family name first. English-facing sites usually flip it, but not always, and not consistently within the same site.
So a search for a name you saw somewhere else fails not because she is absent, but because you and the site chose different spellings of the same sounds.
What the official site gives you
Better than you would expect, with one gap.
The English side publishes a romanised name for essentially every performer in the catalogue. We counted 1,720 performers, and only 12 have no romanised name at all.
That is a good result. The gap is that those names are given once, in one spelling, with no alternates. There is no “also known as” anywhere. If your spelling differs from theirs, the search does not find her.
Shiri-ChikaraTwo cases where there is no surname to search
Single-word stage names. A number of performers work under one name only, sometimes styled in capitals. RYU and Rena are both in the top three by title count. Searching for a family name that does not exist returns nothing, and the English spelling gives you no hint that there is no second half.
Stage names change. Performers work under different names across studios and career stages. The catalogue credits whichever name was in use at the time, so one person can hold two separate entries a decade apart.
We do not maintain an alias table and we do not merge entries on a resemblance. Attaching one performer’s filmography to another is a worse outcome than a failed search, so where we are not certain, we say nothing.
What actually works
Search on the distinctive half. Family names in this industry repeat constantly — there are a great many Satos and Suzukis. Given names are more distinctive. If you remember both, search the given name.
Ignore long vowels. If the name has an “ou” or a “oo” in it, try it without. Romanisation choices land differently and this is the most common single point of failure.
Try both orders. Family-first and given-first are both in circulation.
Go through a title. If you remember any title she was in, find the title first. Cast is listed on every title page with names linked.
Or stop searching and browse. Our performers page lists all 239 at once, sorted by title count and grouped by the kind of titles each one appears in. Scanning a list defeats spelling problems completely. The top 25 by title count is the shortest version of the same thing.
Porn Star Encyclopedia: Mayu Aoyama, Kaede Takagaki, Mina Sakura, Rin FujinoOnce you have found her
This is where the official site stops being useful, and it stops abruptly.
A performer page gives you her titles. It does not tell you what kind of work she does, which categories attach to it, or who else you would like. There is no “similar performers” anywhere on the site.
We built ours to answer exactly that. Each of our 239 performer pages — everyone with six titles or more — shows what kind of titles she appears in, which categories attach most often to her work, and whose filmography most resembles hers.
All of it is counted from the full catalogue rather than asserted. The similarity is a tag-distribution comparison, not an opinion.
Why six titles
Because below that, the numbers say nothing.
Of the 1,720 performers in the catalogue, a large share appear once. With one or two titles, “the categories that attach most often to her work” is just the categories on that one title. It reads like analysis and is noise.
Six is where the distribution starts to mean something. That leaves 239 people we can say anything useful about, and about 1,500 we cannot — which we would rather admit than pad. 801 of them appear in exactly one title, which is the real shape of this catalogue.
Please Forgive MeThe short version
- Searches fail on romanisation, not absence. Long vowels and name order are the usual culprits
- The official site romanises all but 12 of 1,720 performers — but gives one spelling and no alternates
- Search the given name, drop long vowels, try both orders, or find a title first
- The official site has no similar-performer feature at all
- Our 239 performer pages cover everyone with six titles or more, counted rather than asserted
